We would like to offer the Libertarian view concerning subjects that affect us all, such as education, interference with free markets, social mores, individual rights. Please read our articles on various issues, as well as the summary of our views below.
Crime and Violence: We suggest the following: 1) Address the root causes of crime, such as mediocre schools, lack of economic opportunities, dependence on government, and misguided policies like the War on Drugs. 2) Require that criminals pay victims restitution for medical expenses, loss of property, and pain and suffering. 3) Focus on real crimes that harm the innocent.
Education of children: Monopolies are generally viewed as inefficient means of delivering products or services. In the absence of competition, monopolies have no incentive to produce the best possible goods. Government schools are no exception. Therefore, we support diverse systems which offer families the greatest choice, encourage highest parental involvement, and force competing systems to deliver their best efforts. Poor children often suffer the most under the current educational system, since those that want to learn, lacking choices, are grouped with those who choose to be uninvolved and disruptive. We encourage families in poorly-performing school districts to explore alternatives such as, charter schools, voucher programs, and parent-managed co-ops, including home schooling co-ops
Environment: Individuals bear primary responsibility for their own well being as well as that of Mother Earth. The free market responds to consumers’ demands. If consumers keep themselves informed and demand products and services that do the least environmental harm, the need for government’s vast array of costly environmental regulation disappears.
Foreign Policy: "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations -- entangling alliances with none." (Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address). Build positive relationships, with emphasis on free trade. Avoid negative relationships, with emphasis on military non-intervention.
Gun Laws: Prohibition did not stop liquor use. The War on Drugs did not stop drug use. Gun prohibition will not stop criminals from owning guns. The Bill of Rights is intended to protect people from a government wanting to go rogue, and the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights gives people the ultimate means to do so.
Health Care: Regulation increases the cost of any product, including healthcare. Transparency, competition, and an informed citizenry keep costs more affordable than healthcare supported by a vast, resource-wasting bureaucracy.
Immigration: Whenever laws conflict with how people actually live and sectors of the economy actually work, problems arise. No amount of “immigration reform” will change these contradictory facts: 1) Sectors of the U.S. economy need low-skilled workers, while everybody’s aspiration is to go to college. 2) Sectors of the economy need highly-skilled technicians who are flexible in their demands, while everybody’s aspiration is a highly-paid position with all kinds of benefits. We need to remove barriers that interfere with how people actually live.
Personal Liberty: Libertarians are guided by the principle of non-aggression. Guided thus, individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. If government is held to the limited responsibilities spelled out in the Constitution, it will not intrude in individuals’ privacy, preferences, or choices.
Poverty and Welfare: Government has the habit of first creating a problem, then passing vast amounts of legislation in attempts to solve it. Policies such as taxation and regulation discourage entrepreneurism that creates jobs. “Solutions” have done nothing but make more people dependent on government and less able to fend for themselves. A better approach is to remove barriers to entrepreneurial activity, and institute a dollar for dollar tax credit for donations to charities that help those who truly need assistance.
Taxes: Government's role needs to be limited to its Constitutional function of protecting life, property, and individual rights, as well as defending us from foreign attack. Those functions can be funded by minimal taxation, as was the original intent of our Constitution. It should be evident that the unchecked growth of government at all levels requires more taxation, which removes money from the free market economy that provides livelihoods.
The Independent Institute’s website is full of informative books, articles, and videos, all of which the Libertarian Party of San Francisco recommends. But one video series is an absolute must see. Here is the Independent Institute’s description of the series:
“Independent Institute's new video series—Love Gov: From First Date to Mandate—is now on YouTube! The series personifies the folly, cost, and intrusiveness of government in the lives of everyone, especially the young.
The 5-part series depicts the federal government as an overbearing boyfriend—Scott "Gov" Govinsky—who foists his "good intentions" on hapless, idealistic college student, Alexis. Each episode follows Alexis's relationship with "Gov" as his intrusions wreck comic havoc on her life, professionally, financially, and socially. "Gov" creates excessive student-loan debt, expensive housing, unemployment, inadequate and expensive healthcare, and personal privacy violations.
Alexis's loyal friend Libby tries to help her see "Gov" for what he really is—a menace. But will Alexis come to her senses in time? Tune in to find out!
'Love Gov is a way to help anyone, especially Millennials, understand the government’s ever-expanding reach into personal lives,' says David J. Theroux, Founder and President of Independent Institute. 'It's a lighthearted approach to reach audiences on a personal level, and inspire them to learn more and take action.'
Love Gov also connects with the newly redesigned MyGovCost mobile app, enabling you to estimate your lifetime federal tax liability and the assets you could have accrued if your taxes were instead privately invested. To see what Washington is costing you, download this FREE mobile app now, or visit MyGovCost.org for the web-based version of the calculator!
Watch Love Gov to find out if Alexis can recover from Gov's folly, and help us spread the word and share this must-see video series with your friends, family, colleagues, and neighbors."
Watch the video. Spread the message.
4th of July is this weekend. There will be hotdogs and firecrackers. There will be celebrations that “All men are created equal.” There might not be enough remembrance of another significant paragraph in the Declaration of Independence: “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”
Unlike revolutionaries the world over, who “have nothing to lose but their chains,” the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence were mostly wealthy landowners with prominent positions in their communities. They knew that by placing their names on the document that would ignite the fuse of liberty, they would doom themselves to either long years of a new nation’s hardships or the hangman’s noose.
What these gallant 56 were determined to do was so new that perhaps there was no way they could not do it. They declared that liberty is an unalienable right. That means that nobody – not government, not the powerful, not the rich – gives it to us. We just have it. They declared that everyone is created equal. Now that planted a novel seed in a collective world consciousness where servitude, in one form or another, was the norm! They limited rights to three: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That’s it. They went against everything that went before: “To secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” That means that We the People give government consent, not the other way around.
Some of the signers were captured and tortured, some were killed during the war, and all came out of the conflict in worse financial shape. All were committed to actually establishing a society in which government existed by the consent of the people. Are we the people today committed to keeping that vision? We at the Libertarian Party of San Francisco wish you all a happy 4th of July.
Picture: Franklin, Adams, and Jefferson "Writing the Declaration of Independence," by Jean Leon Ferris, 1900. This is one of 78 of the artist's paintings in his collection "Pageant of a Nation."
History puts the present into perspective. Therefore, we are offering this informal and brief history of San Francisco’s Mission District in hopes of adding a little more perspective to the present discussion of “The Mission Moratorium,” which would halt construction of market-rate housing in the district for at least 45 days.
“On June 27th, 1776, a settlement party from Monterey, consisting of soldiers, colonists, their families, Franciscan priests, Christianized natives, and 200 head of cattle, entered the valley through a cleft in the hills bordering the valley to the south, now called the Bernal Gap.”
This is how the story of the Mission District starts. The Spanish colonizers moved in and displaced the Ohlone People who had lived in the valley for 5,000 years.
By the 1830’s Mexican ranchos built on land grants replaced the missions established by the Franciscan friars. After the Treaty of Guadalupe, pioneer settlers and immigrants -- mostly of German, Irish, and Italian descent -- challenged the land ownership of the rancheros with the help of the U.S. federal government and won. The Gold Rush attracted a large number of new settlers who called their ethnically subdivided housing plots in the Mission valley home.
“In the department of economy, an act, a habit, an institution, a law, gives birth not only to an effect, but to a series of effects. Of these effects, the first only is immediate; it manifests itself simultaneously with its cause - it is seen. The others unfold in succession - they are not seen: it is well for us, if they are foreseen.” 1
The above paragraph, written in 1850, is the introduction to Frederic Bastiat’s dissertation That Which is Seen and That Which is Unseen, a collection of ideas that seem good – the seen – but devolve into unintended consequences – the unseen. Idea number one is “The Broken Window,” a fable about a child who breaks a window in his father’s bakery shop. The baker’s neighbors tell him that his purchase of a new window will put money in the glazier’s hands, the glazier can buy new goods, and the whole neighborhood economy will profit. Bastiat reminds us that the unseen consequence is that the baker, who was planning to purchase a new suit, now does not have money to do so, and the tailor misses out on money with which to buy more goods.
Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize winner and New York Times columnist, would side with the baker’s neighbors. He wrote in his opinion piece of September 14, 2001, “Reckonings After the Horror,” “Ghastly as it may seem to say this, the terror attack -- like the original day of infamy, which brought an end to the Great Depression -- could even do some economic good…Now, all of a sudden, we need some new office buildings. As I've already indicated, the destruction isn't big compared with the economy, but rebuilding will generate at least some increase in business spending.”2 Break some windows, improve the economy. We will see if the rubble left behind by protesters in Baltimore this week will do wonders for the region’s economy.
Some in the press have blamed another broken window theory for the deaths of black men at the hands of police. The Economist article “What Broken Windows Policing Is” says, “In July 2014 an unarmed black man named Eric Garner died at the hands of a police officer after allegedly resisting arrest. Garner’s presumed crime was selling ‘loosies’, or untaxed cigarettes, on a street corner in Staten Island… Some say the problem is ‘broken windows’ policing, an approach to law enforcement based on the theory that cracking down on minor crimes helps to prevent major ones.” 3 Based on broken windows (plural) policing, New York instituted “stop and frisk,” under which mostly black and Hispanic men are stopped and searched without probable cause, creating a great deal of animosity and distrust between neighborhoods of color and police.
The article quoted above goes on to say: “The term ‘broken windows’ refers to an observation made in the early 1980s by [George] Kelling, a criminologist, and James Wilson, a social scientist, that when a building window is broken and left unrepaired, the rest of the windows will soon be broken too.”
Written by guest poster Phil Berg
It's the money, stupid
There are two things involved in any transaction, the stuff and the money. It used to be that gas was five cents a gallon. Now it's three bucks. It's still the same old gas. So what has changed? The bucks have changed. The same goes for housing--more bucks chasing a fixed housing stock.
Let’s follow the money. But before I continue, I should say that almost everybody thinks that money is too complicated. It is much easier to make an emotional decision to just throw up your hands and blame greed. Blaming a broken market on greed is like blaming an airplane crash on gravity. Of course gravity is to blame, but the other reasons need to be investigated.
Following the money
One source of more money chasing housing is mortgages. The cash for mortgages largely comes from banks. Now, most people think that banks just recycle money from depositors. OK, this is right where most people stop listening and change the topic. But right here is the crux of the problem.
It is a little complicated. This is largely because we like to think that things work in a logical way. Honesty works in a logical. Fraud is more complicated. The machinery for creating more money for mortgages, or any other credit, is a fraud. That is a strong statement, but please just entertain the idea. Think about it for a while after you read this.
You will not be alone in being dazed by what I am about to write. No less a famous liberal economist, John Kenneth Galbraith, said that, “The mind is repelled by the notion of how money creation works.”
So here goes
We will start with a car loan, so as not to be distracted by the complications of real estate.